I'd settle for a wolf in wolf's clothing.
But on the neonic thing, there have been a slew of papers in the last couple of years that show worrying things like significant contamination around fields - and also bumble bees managing to gather pollen with relatively high levels of neonics. It might be some of them that changed Gove's mind (and those of his advisers).
Bramble and creeping thistle were particularly high (foliage was tested).
https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gat...t-env-2016.pdf
Here's another paper that shows that bumble bees (but not honey bees, particularly, with that explained as possibly them foraging over a wider area) can end up with contaminated pollen in their nests at higher levels than you might expect from the known levels in crop pollen.
http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/59217/1/Draf...ur%20David.pdf
Here is Jerry Wright's work that could explain a tendency for bees to collect the more contaminated sources. Goulson's team didn't discuss this in their paper but it could explain the results:
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14414
Bookmarks